# Arsen vs Adaptive Security

Source: https://arsen.co/en/comparisons/arsen-vs-adaptive
Summary: Compare Arsen and Adaptive Security on deepfake, vishing, phishing simulation, API integration and MSP support for your human risk program.

Choose Arsen if you need AI-era simulation depth alongside European data handling, an open phishing API, and multi-tenant management for clients or business units.

## Human risk management feature matrix

Every row is an Arsen human risk management capability. Adaptive Security is checked only when that capability is explicitly visible on Adaptive Security's public product pages.

### ⚡ Attack simulations

| Feature | Arsen | Adaptive Security | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Phishing simulation | Yes | Yes | Both platforms support phishing simulation with AI-generated, role-aware scenarios. |
| AI voice phishing / vishing simulation | Yes | Yes | Both simulate voice-based social engineering with cloned voices. |
| Conversational phishing simulation | Yes | Partial | Arsen supports multi-turn exchanges that adapt to what the target replies. Adaptive's interactive avatar capability has been described publicly as a feature preview, so confirm current availability. |
| Deepfake simulation | Yes | Yes | Both deploy AI-generated voice and video impersonation as simulation scenarios. |
| ClickFix phishing simulation | Yes | No | Arsen supports ClickFix-style simulations against fake-fix and prompt-driven tactics. Adaptive does not list this as a distinct scenario type. |
| QR-code attack simulation | Yes | Yes | Both generate QR-code payloads that mimic real-world quishing attacks. |
| OSINT-based employee profiling | Yes | Yes | Both use publicly available data to tailor scenarios by role, seniority, and context. |
| Multichannel social engineering coverage | Yes | Yes | Both coordinate campaigns across email, SMS, voice, and impersonation channels. |

### 🧠 Training and remediation

| Feature | Arsen | Adaptive Security | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Micro-learning training | Yes | Yes | Both provide short-form micro-learning modules. |
| AI lesson creation | Yes | Yes | Both support AI-assisted content creation for awareness programs. |
| Static content delivery | Yes | Yes | Both deliver static assets as part of structured awareness workflows. |
| Behavior-focused human risk program | Yes | Yes | Both generate behavioral risk scores rather than training-completion metrics. |
| Triggered lesson | Yes | Yes | Both trigger remediation based on simulation outcomes and risk signals. |
| Adaptative training | Yes | Yes | Both adapt content delivery to each employee's risk profile. |
| Employee-facing dashboard | Yes | Yes | Both give employees visibility into their own progress. |

### 📊 Reporting and operations

| Feature | Arsen | Adaptive Security | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Real-time campaign reporting | Yes | Yes | Both offer live dashboards during active campaigns. |
| Employee risk / security score | Yes | Yes | Both assign behavioral risk scores with board-level rollups. |
| Employee credential exposure monitoring | Yes | Partial | Arsen monitors exposed employee credentials as part of Threat Monitoring. Adaptive's public materials focus on OSINT for simulation personalization. |
| Typosquat and look-alike domain monitoring | Yes | Partial | Arsen monitors look-alike domains registered against your brand as an ongoing service. |
| Phishing triage of reported emails | Partial | Yes | Adaptive pairs employee reporting with AI-assisted triage at scale. |
| Google / Microsoft / Okta sync | Yes | Yes | Both integrate with major identity providers for user provisioning. |
| API-driven phishing workflows | Yes | Partial | Arsen exposes APIs to trigger simulations, sync results, and embed phishing into your existing security stack. |
| Multi-tenant and white-label management | Yes | Partial | Arsen supports multi-tenant access and white-label deployment for MSPs and security vendors from a single console. |
| EU data residency by default | Yes | Partial | Arsen is a European company operating under EU data handling. Confirm Adaptive's residency terms if this is a requirement. |

Arsen offers transparent, per-user pricing with no hidden fees for multichannel simulations. Request a personalized quote during your demo.

## Why teams switch

### Same threat model. Different operating constraints.

Adaptive and Arsen agree on the problem: email-only testing no longer reflects how attackers work. Where teams choose Arsen is on the operating side, when the program has to run under European data rules, plug into an existing security stack through an API, or be delivered to multiple client organizations from one console.

**Adaptive Security** — A strong AI-native simulation platform with well-developed deepfake and voice-clone scenarios, built primarily around the US enterprise market. A credible option if that is your centre of gravity.

**Arsen** — Comparable AI-era simulation depth, delivered by a European vendor with EU data handling, an open phishing API, ongoing threat monitoring, and multi-tenant white-label management for partners and MSPs.

## Migration support

### Switching from Adaptive Security? We make it easy.

Arsen's team handles migration, user import, and reporting continuity so your program never misses a beat. Most teams are live within a week.

- Awareness program continuity
- Integration setup
- User and group migration

Typical go-live in under a week

## Common questions about Arsen vs Adaptive Security

### I'm ready to see Arsen in action. Can I get a demo?

Yes. Book a personalized demo and we will walk you through phishing, deepfake, vishing, QR-code, and impersonation simulations, including a live AI voice call so you can judge the realism against what you have already seen.

### Can I speak to someone on the team?

Absolutely. If you have questions about fit, migration, integrations, or rollout, use the demo form and our team will get back to you quickly. We can keep the conversation focused on your current program and your constraints.

### How do I know whether Arsen or Adaptive Security is the better fit for my team?

The simulation capabilities overlap more than most comparisons on this list. The deciding factors are usually operational: where your data must live, whether you need to drive simulations through an API, and whether you manage one organization or many. Arsen is built for European data handling, API integration, and multi-tenant delivery.

### We're using Adaptive Security today. Can we migrate without starting from scratch?

Yes. You do not need to rebuild your program from zero. Arsen can help you move user and group structure, maintain awareness-program continuity, configure integrations, and preserve reporting workflows so the switch feels operational rather than disruptive.

### I still have questions. What's the best next step?

Book a demo and tell us what you are evaluating. We can help you think through feature fit, migration effort, multichannel coverage, and how Arsen would map to your current Adaptive Security program. If you are earlier in the process, this comparison page should help you narrow the shortlist first.