# Arsen vs Frame Security

Source: https://arsen.co/en/comparisons/arsen-vs-frame
Summary: Compare Arsen and Frame Security on phishing, vishing and deepfake simulation, training generation, reporting and deployment maturity for your human risk program.

Choose Arsen if you want AI-era simulation depth backed by a platform that has been running production campaigns for enterprise security teams since 2020.

## Human risk management feature matrix

Every row is an Arsen human risk management capability. Frame Security is checked only when that capability is explicitly visible on Frame Security's public product pages.

### ⚡ Attack simulations

| Feature | Arsen | Frame Security | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Phishing simulation | Yes | Yes | Both platforms generate personalized phishing scenarios tailored to role and context. |
| AI voice phishing / vishing simulation | Yes | Yes | Both simulate phone-based social engineering. Arsen runs live AI voice calls with real-time conversation and voice cloning. |
| Conversational phishing simulation | Yes | No | Arsen supports multi-turn exchanges that adapt to what the target replies. Frame does not document an equivalent as a standalone simulation type. |
| Deepfake simulation | Yes | Yes | Both deploy AI-generated voice and video impersonation as simulation scenarios. |
| ClickFix phishing simulation | Yes | No | Arsen supports ClickFix-style simulations against fake-fix and prompt-driven tactics. |
| QR-code attack simulation | Yes | Partial | Arsen generates QR-code payloads that mimic real-world quishing attacks. |
| Multichannel social engineering coverage | Yes | Yes | Both work beyond the inbox. Arsen coordinates email, SMS, live voice, QR, and impersonation into single campaign workflows. |

### 🧠 Training and remediation

| Feature | Arsen | Frame Security | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Micro-learning training | Yes | Yes | Both provide short-form modules delivered at the point of failure. |
| AI lesson creation | Yes | Yes | Both support AI-assisted content creation. Frame generates training from your own policies and tech stack across 70+ languages. |
| Static content delivery | Yes | Yes | Both deliver static assets as part of structured awareness workflows. |
| Behavior-focused human risk program | Yes | Yes | Both maintain continuously updated risk models at individual, team, and organizational level. |
| Triggered lesson | Yes | Yes | Both deliver targeted training immediately after a failed simulation. |
| Adaptative training | Yes | Yes | Both adapt content to observed behavior and role. |
| Employee-facing dashboard | Yes | Partial | Arsen gives employees direct visibility into their own progress and score. |

### 📊 Reporting and operations

| Feature | Arsen | Frame Security | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Real-time campaign reporting | Yes | Yes | Both offer live dashboards with filtering and scheduled distribution. |
| Employee risk / security score | Yes | Yes | Both assign continuously updated risk scores across the organization. |
| Employee credential exposure monitoring | Yes | Partial | Arsen monitors exposed employee credentials as part of Threat Monitoring. |
| Typosquat and look-alike domain monitoring | Yes | Partial | Arsen monitors look-alike domains registered against your brand as an ongoing service. |
| Google / Microsoft / Okta sync | Yes | Partial | Arsen integrates with major identity providers for user provisioning. Confirm Frame's current integration list directly. |
| API-driven phishing workflows | Yes | Partial | Arsen exposes APIs to trigger simulations, sync results, and embed phishing into your existing security stack. |
| Multi-tenant and white-label management | Yes | Partial | Arsen supports multi-tenant access and white-label deployment for MSPs and security vendors from a single console. |
| Track record in production | Yes | Partial | Arsen has been running simulation programs since 2020 and is used by more than 1,000 organizations. |

Arsen offers transparent, per-user pricing with no hidden fees for multichannel simulations. Request a personalized quote during your demo.

## Why teams switch

### A convincing roadmap is not the same as a proven program.

Frame is building something genuinely interesting, and the thesis is right: generic quarterly awareness no longer reflects the threat. The question a security team has to answer is whether the platform can carry a program through procurement, rollout, and audit today. Arsen has been doing exactly that since 2020.

**Frame Security** — A well-funded, newly launched human risk platform with strong AI-generated training and simulation, and an ambitious view of how awareness programs should work. Best suited to teams comfortable adopting early.

**Arsen** — A mature specialist in social engineering realism, with live AI voice simulation, deepfake across 50+ countries, managed phishing infrastructure, threat monitoring, and multi-tenant delivery for partners.

## Migration support

### Switching from Frame Security? We make it easy.

Arsen's team handles migration, user import, and reporting continuity so your program never misses a beat. Most teams are live within a week.

- Awareness program continuity
- Integration setup
- User and group migration

Typical go-live in under a week

## Common questions about Arsen vs Frame Security

### I'm ready to see Arsen in action. Can I get a demo?

Yes. Book a personalized demo and we will walk you through phishing, deepfake, vishing, QR-code, and impersonation simulations, including a live AI voice call so you can judge the realism yourself.

### Can I speak to someone on the team?

Absolutely. If you have questions about fit, migration, integrations, or rollout, use the demo form and our team will get back to you quickly. We can keep the conversation focused on your current program and your constraints.

### How do I know whether Arsen or Frame Security is the better fit for my team?

Frame's strength is generated training built from your own environment, and it is worth a look if that is your priority. If you need documented multichannel simulation coverage, SMS delivery across many countries, European data handling, an open API, or multi-tenant delivery to clients, Arsen is usually the better fit today.

### We're using Frame Security today. Can we migrate without starting from scratch?

Yes. You do not need to rebuild your program from zero. Arsen can help you move user and group structure, maintain awareness-program continuity, configure integrations, and preserve reporting workflows so the switch feels operational rather than disruptive.

### I still have questions. What's the best next step?

Book a demo and tell us what you are evaluating. We can help you think through feature fit, migration effort, multichannel coverage, and how Arsen would map to your current program. If you are earlier in the process, this comparison page should help you narrow the shortlist first.