# Arsen vs Riot

Source: https://arsen.co/en/comparisons/arsen-vs-riot
Summary: Compare Arsen and Riot on phishing, vishing, QR-code and deepfake simulation, training depth and reporting. See which fits your human risk program.

Choose Arsen if you need deeper social engineering realism, broader multichannel coverage, and a faster path from awareness to measurable behavior change.

## Human risk management feature matrix

Every row is an Arsen human risk management capability. Riot is checked only when that capability is explicitly visible on Riot's public product pages.

### ⚡ Attack simulations

| Feature | Arsen | Riot | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Phishing simulation | Yes | Yes | Both Arsen and Riot support phishing simulation for email-based social engineering scenarios. |
| AI voice phishing / vishing simulation | Yes | No | Arsen simulates realistic phone-based social engineering attacks targeting frontline employees. |
| Conversational phishing simulation | Yes | No | Arsen supports conversational phishing scenarios that feel closer to real attacker exchanges than static email templates. |
| Deepfake simulation | Yes | No | Arsen deploys AI-generated voice and video impersonation as operational deepfake simulation scenarios. |
| ClickFix phishing simulation | Yes | No | Arsen supports ClickFix-style phishing simulations to test users against fake-fix and prompt-driven social engineering tactics. |
| QR-code attack simulation | Yes | No | Arsen generates QR-code payloads that mimic real-world physical and digital QR attacks. |
| Multichannel social engineering coverage | Yes | No | Arsen combines email, SMS, voice, QR, and impersonation into coordinated social engineering campaign workflows. |

### 🧠 Training and remediation

| Feature | Arsen | Riot | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Micro-learning training | Yes | Yes | Both platforms provide short-form micro-learning training modules for employee awareness programs. |
| AI lesson creation | Yes | Yes | Both platforms support AI-assisted lesson creation. Riot handles this through its Studio module. |
| Static content delivery | Yes | Partial | Arsen supports static content delivery as part of structured awareness and remediation workflows. Riot's Studio is oriented toward custom course creation. |
| Behavior-focused human risk program | Yes | Yes | Both track behavior change over time. Riot uses a karma score, Arsen ties its score to simulation realism and difficulty weighting. |
| Triggered lesson | Yes | Yes | Both can route employees to remediation after a failed simulation. Riot directs at-risk users to a three-minute refresher. |
| Adaptative training | Yes | Partial | Arsen adjusts remediation paths based on individual behavior and risk signals. Riot automates targeting through smart groups rather than per-user adaptation. |
| Employee-facing dashboard | Yes | Yes | Both platforms provide an employee-facing dashboard experience for training and program interaction. |

### 📊 Reporting and operations

| Feature | Arsen | Riot | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Real-time campaign reporting | Yes | Yes | Both platforms offer live dashboards during active campaigns. |
| Employee risk / security score | Yes | Yes | Both assign risk scores. Arsen weights multichannel simulation performance more heavily. |
| Employee credential exposure monitoring | Yes | Yes | Both monitor exposed employee credentials. Riot delivers this through its Breaches module, Arsen through Threat Monitoring. |
| Typosquat and look-alike domain monitoring | Yes | No | Arsen monitors look-alike domains registered against your brand alongside credential leaks. |
| Inbound email threat detection and removal | No | Yes | Riot's Slash module analyses inbound mail, warns employees inline, and removes confirmed threats across mailboxes. |
| 24/7 employee cyber hotline | No | Yes | Riot's Sonar module gives employees a round-the-clock channel to flag suspicious activity. |
| Google / Microsoft / Okta sync | Yes | Yes | Both integrate with major identity providers for user provisioning. |
| API-driven phishing workflows | Yes | Partial | Arsen exposes APIs to trigger simulations, sync results, and integrate into security toolchains. Riot does not publicly document an equivalent API. |
| Multi-tenant and white-label management | Yes | Partial | Arsen supports multi-tenant access and white-label deployment for MSPs and partners. |

Arsen offers transparent, per-user pricing with no hidden fees for multichannel simulations. Request a personalized quote during your demo.

## Why teams switch

### Your employees still click. Awareness alone won't fix that.

Awareness platforms check compliance boxes. Arsen puts employees through realistic phishing, vishing, and deepfake scenarios, so they build muscle memory rather than knowledge they forget by the next quarter.

**Riot** — A broad employee-security layer covering awareness, inbound email protection, breach alerts, and a 24/7 hotline. Best suited to teams prioritizing wide coverage across security dimensions over specialized simulation depth.

**Arsen** — Purpose-built for realistic multichannel simulations across phishing, vishing, deepfake, and AI-driven impersonation, with behavior-change reporting that proves your program works under pressure.

## Migration support

### Switching from Riot? We make it easy.

Arsen's team handles migration, user import, and reporting continuity so your program never misses a beat. Most teams are live within a week.

- Awareness program continuity
- Integration setup
- User and group migration

Typical go-live in under a week

## Common questions about Arsen vs Riot

### I'm ready to see Arsen in action. Can I get a demo?

Yes. If you want to see how Arsen works with your own use cases in mind, book a personalized demo with our team. We can walk you through phishing, deepfake, vishing, QR-code, and impersonation simulations, and show you how the platform compares with Riot in the areas your team actually cares about.

### Can I speak to someone on the team?

Absolutely. If you have questions about fit, migration, integrations, or rollout, use the demo form and our team will get back to you quickly. If it helps, we can make the conversation practical and focus only on your current program, your constraints, and whether Arsen is the right next step.

### How do I know whether Arsen or Riot is the better fit for my team?

The easiest way to decide is to compare your must-have list against the way each platform is built. If your priority is broad employee-security coverage with inbound email protection and a support hotline, Riot may feel closer to that brief. If your priority is deeper social engineering realism, stronger multichannel simulation coverage, and clearer behavior-change reporting, Arsen is usually the better fit.

### We're using Riot today. Can we migrate without starting from scratch?

Yes. You do not need to rebuild your program from zero. Arsen can help you move user and group structure, maintain awareness-program continuity, configure integrations, and preserve reporting workflows so the switch feels operational rather than disruptive.

### I still have questions. What's the best next step?

If you want quick answers, book a demo and tell us what you are evaluating. We can help you think through feature fit, migration effort, multichannel coverage, and how Arsen would map to your current Riot program. If you are still earlier in the process, this comparison page should help you narrow the shortlist before you talk to us.