# Arsen vs SoSafe

Source: https://arsen.co/en/comparisons/arsen-vs-sosafe
Summary: Compare Arsen and SoSafe on multichannel simulation, vishing and deepfake coverage, training design and reporting. See which suits your human risk program.

Choose Arsen if your program needs live voice and impersonation realism, managed attack infrastructure, and simulation depth that goes past the awareness curriculum.

## Human risk management feature matrix

Every row is an Arsen human risk management capability. SoSafe is checked only when that capability is explicitly visible on SoSafe's public product pages.

### ⚡ Attack simulations

| Feature | Arsen | SoSafe | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Phishing simulation | Yes | Yes | Both platforms support phishing simulation with localized template libraries. |
| AI voice phishing / vishing simulation | Yes | Partial | Arsen runs live AI voice calls with real-time conversation and voice cloning. SoSafe lists phone-based simulation among its channels, so confirm scope and language coverage directly with their team. |
| Conversational phishing simulation | Yes | Partial | Arsen supports multi-turn exchanges that adapt to what the target replies. SoSafe does not document an equivalent as a standalone simulation type. |
| Deepfake simulation | Yes | Partial | Arsen deploys AI-generated voice and video impersonation as operational simulation scenarios. Confirm SoSafe's current deepfake scope directly. |
| ClickFix phishing simulation | Yes | No | Arsen supports ClickFix-style simulations against fake-fix and prompt-driven tactics. SoSafe does not list this as a distinct scenario type. |
| QR-code attack simulation | Yes | Yes | Both generate QR-code payloads that mimic real-world quishing attacks. |
| Multichannel social engineering coverage | Yes | Yes | Both coordinate across channels. SoSafe spans email, SMS, QR, social, and USB; Arsen centres its coverage on email, SMS, live voice, QR, and impersonation. |

### 🧠 Training and remediation

| Feature | Arsen | SoSafe | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Micro-learning training | Yes | Yes | Both provide short-form micro-learning modules. SoSafe grounds its content in behavioural science and spaced repetition. |
| AI lesson creation | Yes | Yes | Both support AI-assisted content creation. SoSafe delivers this through Simulation Studio and its Sofie assistant. |
| Static content delivery | Yes | Yes | Both deliver static assets as part of structured awareness programs. |
| Behavior-focused human risk program | Yes | Yes | Both track behavior over time. SoSafe uses its Human Risk OS layer; Arsen weights simulation difficulty and multichannel performance. |
| Triggered lesson | Yes | Yes | Both trigger contextual learning immediately after a failed simulation. |
| Adaptative training | Yes | Yes | Both adapt difficulty and frequency to individual behavior. |
| Employee-facing dashboard | Yes | Yes | Both give employees visibility into their own progress. |

### 📊 Reporting and operations

| Feature | Arsen | SoSafe | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Real-time campaign reporting | Yes | Yes | Both offer live dashboards during active campaigns. |
| Employee risk / security score | Yes | Yes | Both assign individual risk scores based on observed behavior rather than completion rates. |
| Employee credential exposure monitoring | Yes | Partial | Arsen monitors exposed employee credentials as part of Threat Monitoring. SoSafe does not document this as a core module. |
| Typosquat and look-alike domain monitoring | Yes | Partial | Arsen monitors look-alike domains registered against your brand. |
| Reported-threat triage routing | Partial | Yes | SoSafe's Threat Inbox routes reported messages into ServiceNow or Jira Service Management workflows. |
| Google / Microsoft / Okta sync | Yes | Yes | Both integrate with major identity providers for user provisioning. |
| API-driven phishing workflows | Yes | Yes | Both expose APIs. Arsen's API is built to trigger simulations directly from your security stack. |
| Multi-tenant and white-label management | Yes | Partial | Arsen supports multi-tenant access and white-label deployment for MSPs and security vendors from a single console. |

Arsen offers transparent, per-user pricing with no hidden fees for multichannel simulations. Request a personalized quote during your demo.

## Why teams switch

### Great learning design still needs a convincing attack.

Behavioural science makes training stick. It does not make a simulated phone call sound like a real one. Arsen builds the attack side with the same care most vendors reserve for the curriculum: managed sending infrastructure, custom domains, live voice AI, and impersonation scenarios your employees have not already seen.

**SoSafe** — A behavioural-science-led awareness platform with strong European compliance credentials, wide language coverage, and a well-developed learning experience. Best suited to teams whose priority is the training program itself.

**Arsen** — A specialist in social engineering realism, with live AI voice simulation, coordinated multichannel campaigns, managed phishing infrastructure, and behavior-change reporting built on how employees perform under pressure.

## Migration support

### Switching from SoSafe? We make it easy.

Arsen's team handles migration, user import, and reporting continuity so your program never misses a beat. Most teams are live within a week.

- Awareness program continuity
- Integration setup
- User and group migration

Typical go-live in under a week

## Common questions about Arsen vs SoSafe

### I'm ready to see Arsen in action. Can I get a demo?

Yes. Book a personalized demo and we will walk you through phishing, deepfake, vishing, QR-code, and impersonation simulations, including a live AI voice call so you can judge the realism yourself.

### Can I speak to someone on the team?

Absolutely. If you have questions about fit, migration, integrations, or rollout, use the demo form and our team will get back to you quickly. We can keep the conversation focused on your current program and your constraints.

### How do I know whether Arsen or SoSafe is the better fit for my team?

If your programme is centred on a broad awareness curriculum with deep behavioural learning design and wide language coverage, SoSafe is close to that brief. If your priority is attack realism, live voice and impersonation simulation, or multi-tenant management for clients, Arsen is usually the better fit.

### We're using SoSafe today. Can we migrate without starting from scratch?

Yes. You do not need to rebuild your program from zero. Arsen can help you move user and group structure, maintain awareness-program continuity, configure integrations, and preserve reporting workflows so the switch feels operational rather than disruptive.

### I still have questions. What's the best next step?

Book a demo and tell us what you are evaluating. We can help you think through feature fit, migration effort, multichannel coverage, and how Arsen would map to your current SoSafe program. If you are earlier in the process, this comparison page should help you narrow the shortlist first.