Comparison Arsen vs Frame Security
Arsen vs Frame Security
Choose Arsen if you want AI-era simulation depth backed by a platform that has been running production campaigns for enterprise security teams since 2020.
Human risk management feature matrix
Every row is an Arsen human risk management capability. Frame Security is checked only when that capability is explicitly visible on Frame Security's public product pages.
| Feature | Arsen | Frame Security |
|---|---|---|
| ⚡ Attack simulations | ||
| Phishing simulation | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both platforms generate personalized phishing scenarios tailored to role and context. |
| AI voice phishing / vishing simulation | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both simulate phone-based social engineering. Arsen runs live AI voice calls with real-time conversation and voice cloning. |
| Conversational phishing simulation | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · No Arsen supports multi-turn exchanges that adapt to what the target replies. Frame does not document an equivalent as a standalone simulation type. |
| Deepfake simulation | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both deploy AI-generated voice and video impersonation as simulation scenarios. |
| ClickFix phishing simulation | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · No Arsen supports ClickFix-style simulations against fake-fix and prompt-driven tactics. |
| QR-code attack simulation | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen generates QR-code payloads that mimic real-world quishing attacks. |
| Multichannel social engineering coverage | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both work beyond the inbox. Arsen coordinates email, SMS, live voice, QR, and impersonation into single campaign workflows. |
| 🧠 Training and remediation | ||
| Micro-learning training | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both provide short-form modules delivered at the point of failure. |
| AI lesson creation | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both support AI-assisted content creation. Frame generates training from your own policies and tech stack across 70+ languages. |
| Static content delivery | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both deliver static assets as part of structured awareness workflows. |
| Behavior-focused human risk program | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both maintain continuously updated risk models at individual, team, and organizational level. |
| Triggered lesson | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both deliver targeted training immediately after a failed simulation. |
| Adaptative training | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both adapt content to observed behavior and role. |
| Employee-facing dashboard | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen gives employees direct visibility into their own progress and score. |
| 📊 Reporting and operations | ||
| Real-time campaign reporting | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both offer live dashboards with filtering and scheduled distribution. |
| Employee risk / security score | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Yes Both assign continuously updated risk scores across the organization. |
| Employee credential exposure monitoring | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen monitors exposed employee credentials as part of Threat Monitoring. |
| Typosquat and look-alike domain monitoring | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen monitors look-alike domains registered against your brand as an ongoing service. |
| Google / Microsoft / Okta sync | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen integrates with major identity providers for user provisioning. Confirm Frame's current integration list directly. |
| API-driven phishing workflows | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen exposes APIs to trigger simulations, sync results, and embed phishing into your existing security stack. |
| Multi-tenant and white-label management | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen supports multi-tenant access and white-label deployment for MSPs and security vendors from a single console. |
| Track record in production | Arsen · Yes | Frame Security · Partial Arsen has been running simulation programs since 2020 and is used by more than 1,000 organizations. |
💡 Arsen offers transparent, per-user pricing with no hidden fees for multichannel simulations. Request a personalized quote during your demo.
Comparison last reviewed . We update these pages regularly as vendors ship new capabilities, but feature sets move quickly and some details may lag behind the latest release. Check the vendor's own documentation for the current state.
A convincing roadmap is not the same as a proven program.
Frame is building something genuinely interesting, and the thesis is right: generic quarterly awareness no longer reflects the threat. The question a security team has to answer is whether the platform can carry a program through procurement, rollout, and audit today. Arsen has been doing exactly that since 2020.
Frame Security
A well-funded, newly launched human risk platform with strong AI-generated training and simulation, and an ambitious view of how awareness programs should work. Best suited to teams comfortable adopting early.
Arsen
A mature specialist in social engineering realism, with live AI voice simulation, deepfake across 50+ countries, managed phishing infrastructure, threat monitoring, and multi-tenant delivery for partners.
Switching from Frame Security? We make it easy.
Arsen's team handles migration, user import, and reporting continuity so your program never misses a beat. Most teams are live within a week.
Typical go-live in under a week
Common questions about Arsen vs Frame Security
-
Yes. Book a personalized demo and we will walk you through phishing, deepfake, vishing, QR-code, and impersonation simulations, including a live AI voice call so you can judge the realism yourself.
-
Absolutely. If you have questions about fit, migration, integrations, or rollout, use the demo form and our team will get back to you quickly. We can keep the conversation focused on your current program and your constraints.
-
Frame's strength is generated training built from your own environment, and it is worth a look if that is your priority. If you need documented multichannel simulation coverage, SMS delivery across many countries, European data handling, an open API, or multi-tenant delivery to clients, Arsen is usually the better fit today.
-
Yes. You do not need to rebuild your program from zero. Arsen can help you move user and group structure, maintain awareness-program continuity, configure integrations, and preserve reporting workflows so the switch feels operational rather than disruptive.
-
Book a demo and tell us what you are evaluating. We can help you think through feature fit, migration effort, multichannel coverage, and how Arsen would map to your current program. If you are earlier in the process, this comparison page should help you narrow the shortlist first.